reede, juuni 18, 2004
Depends on Your Definition of "Conventional"
Today's Wall Street Journal features an editorial that claims the 9/11 commission's report disproves the "conventional wisdom" that Iran didn't support al Qaeda. I have to ask, was that the conventional wisdom? It's certainly not what I thought. I thought Iran's support for all kinds of terrorists was pretty clear and that there had been reports of senior al Qaeda operatives hiding out there. So is the WSJ just grasping for anything to criticize the left for because they can't defend Bush on the Iraq-Saddam links? Yeah, probably.
|
Today's Wall Street Journal features an editorial that claims the 9/11 commission's report disproves the "conventional wisdom" that Iran didn't support al Qaeda. I have to ask, was that the conventional wisdom? It's certainly not what I thought. I thought Iran's support for all kinds of terrorists was pretty clear and that there had been reports of senior al Qaeda operatives hiding out there. So is the WSJ just grasping for anything to criticize the left for because they can't defend Bush on the Iraq-Saddam links? Yeah, probably.
